Skip to content
QuantCalc Tools

Institution record

Hong

Hong Kong BGE Limited

Risk level not supplied2 of 2 licences marked regulated
Source score
—
Warnings
0
Comments
0

Licence records

Licences within our coverage (firms authorised in the uk, ireland and gibraltar) are listed first. Check each one on the regulator's own register.

RegulatorLicence no.StatusLicensed entityDate
CRTier-1
Companies Registry
Not suppliedRegulatedHKBGE TSP Limited2025-06-17
SFCTier-1
Securities and Futures Commission
Not suppliedRegulatedHong Kong BGE Limited2025-06-17

Peer regulatory & risk comparison

Side-by-side supervisory and risk benchmark comparing Hong against peer institutions in our firms authorised in the uk, ireland and gibraltar dataset.

Full directory →
InstitutionPrimary regulatorsRegulated / totalRisk classificationSource scoreWarnings
Hong (this record)
CRSFC
2 / 2Risk level not supplied—0
Mizuho Securities
FCABaFinMAS+4
6 / 7Risk level not supplied—0
Blackwell Global
FCASFCSCB+3
5 / 6Risk level not supplied—0
Hash
CBIFSACR+3
6 / 6Risk level not supplied—0
Swissquote
FCADFSAFINMA+3
5 / 6Risk level not supplied—0
The Capital Group
FCAMASSFC
3 / 3Risk level not supplied—0

Hong: institutional due diligence FAQ

Key supervisory, licensing, and counterparty verification questions generated from the dataset.

What is Hong's regulatory licence status and supervisory authorisation?

In our imported dataset, Hong (legal entity reference: Hong Kong BGE Limited) holds 2 recorded licence entries, of which 2 carry a "regulated" status and 2 are marked regulated or registered: CR (Companies Registry) — licence Not supplied, status: regulated, Tier-1; SFC (Securities and Futures Commission) — licence Not supplied, status: regulated, Tier-1. Institutional due diligence requires verifying that the exact legal entity on your counterparty agreement matches the licensed entity name and registration number on the official CR, SFC public register.

Which of Hong's jurisdictions and licences fall within this site's regulatory coverage?

Hong is registered at Unit 2414-2416, 24th Floor, China Merchants Tower, Shun Tak Centre, 168-200 Connaught Road Central, Sheung Wan, Hong Kong and tracked under our firms authorised in the uk, ireland and gibraltar scope based on its institutional service profile (CFDs, Precious metals, Stock indices, Forex) rather than a domestic focus licence. Its 2 recorded licences (CR, SFC) should be evaluated for cross-border passporting and local solicitation rules.

What is Hong's institutional risk classification, enforcement exposure, and score profile?

Hong carries a "risk level not supplied" classification in the source dataset (composite numeric scores are not supplied for this record). The record flags 0 regulatory warning or complaint counts. Because these figures reflect imported source fields rather than primary audit findings, compliance teams should review primary enforcement bulletins directly.

What operational due diligence steps apply to Hong's platforms, entity structure, and complaints?

Before allocating capital or executing trades with Hong, institutional and retail allocators should: (1) confirm the domain (bg.exchange) against regulator-approved domains to guard against clone firms; (2) verify whether any of the 0 recorded warning/complaint entries or 0 user comments involve withdrawal restrictions or scope violations; and (3) confirm the dispute-resolution ombudsman tied to CR.

Editorial briefings and compliance research from QuantCalc Tools relevant to Hong's supervisory scope.

All research →

Quantitative Risk & Capital Modeling

Basel III Endgame FRTB & ISDA SIMM v2.6+ Quantitative Calibration: Expected Shortfall, Non-Modellable Risk Factors (NMRF), and Cross-Margin Capital Optimization (2026)

Complete quantitative specification of BCBS MAR20-MAR33 Fundamental Review of the Trading Book (FRTB), 97.5% Expected Shortfall liquidity horizon scaling, Risk Factor Eligibility Tests (RFET), SA-CCR alpha factors, and ISDA SIMM initial margin optimization.

Read briefing →

Quantitative Execution & Fee Math

CME SPAN 2 Historical VaR Margin Methodology, Cross-Margining Haircuts & Portfolio Kelly Criterion Optimization

CME SPAN 2 Historical Value-at-Risk (HVaR) margin methodology refers to an institutional clearing risk framework that replaces legacy 16-scenario parametric grid arrays with a 99.0% confidence Filtered Historical Simulation (FHS) engine incorporating exponentially weighted volatility scaling and stress-period tail scenarios. Across multi-asset fixed-income and equity index derivatives portfolios, integrating CME–FICC cross-margining offsets with variance-penalized multi-asset Kelly Criterion sizing reduces initial margin encumbrance by up to 75.0% [75.0%, CME Group Clearing & FICC Cross-Margining Benchmark, Q1 2026] while compressing annualized collateral drag by 142 bps [142 bps, Federal Reserve Bank of New York Reference Rate & Treasury Repo Study, February 2026].

Read briefing →

Cleared Margin & VaR Models

NY Fed SOFR Index ACT/360 In-Arrears Compounding Engine: Observation Shift vs. Lookback Convention Comparison (4.4151% 90-Day Annualized Benchmark)

NY Fed SOFR Index ACT/360 In-Arrears Compounding Engine (SOFR-INDEX-ACT360) stands at 4.4151% (90-Day Annualized) (Source: NY Fed Reference Rates, 2026-10-20), governing accrual period weighting differences and settlemen

Read briefing →

Quantitative Pricing & Options Engines

NY Fed SOFR Index ACT/360 In-Arrears Compounding Engine: Cross-Margining & Capital Efficiency Optimization (4.4151% 90-Day Annualized Benchmark)

NY Fed SOFR Index ACT/360 In-Arrears Compounding Engine (SOFR-INDEX-ACT360) stands at 4.4151% (90-Day Annualized) (Source: NY Fed Reference Rates, 2026-10-20), governing inter-commodity correlation offsets and liquidity

Read briefing →
Hong — Regulation, Licence Records & Risk Profile | QuantCalc Tools