Skip to content
QuantCalc Tools

Editorial Research Index

Institutional briefings & primary regulatory analysis

Peer-reviewed research dossiers, quantitative market structure briefings, and statutory compliance analysis published by QuantCalc Tools.

Published briefings
124
Thematic pillar hubs
6
Fact-check verified
100%
Quantitative Pricing & Options Engines

ISDA Standard Initial Margin Model (SIMM) v2.6 Sensitivity Grid: Execution Slippage, Haircut Floors & Rebalancing Drag ($50M IM Threshold Benchmark)

ISDA Standard Initial Margin Model (SIMM) v2.6 Sensitivity Grid (ISDA-SIMM-MARGIN) stands at $50M (IM Threshold) (Source: ISDA SIMM Governance Forum, 2026-10-20), governing bid-ask spread amortization and turnover-adjust

Elena Rostova, FRM, CQFRead dossier →
Fixed Income Duration & Portfolio Risk

ISDA Standard Initial Margin Model (SIMM) v2.6 Sensitivity Grid: Model Risk Management (SR 11-7) Validation Benchmarks ($50M IM Threshold Benchmark)

ISDA Standard Initial Margin Model (SIMM) v2.6 Sensitivity Grid (ISDA-SIMM-MARGIN) stands at $50M (IM Threshold) (Source: ISDA SIMM Governance Forum, 2026-10-20), governing backtesting Kupiec POF exceptions and Christoff

Elena Rostova, FRM, CQFRead dossier →
Risk-Adjusted Performance Benchmarks

Omega Ratio & Calmar Maximum Drawdown Recovery Engine: Closed-Form Mathematical Specification & IEEE-754 Verification (1.48x Gain-Loss Threshold Ratio Benchmark)

Omega Ratio & Calmar Maximum Drawdown Recovery Engine (OMEGA-CALMAR) stands at 1.48x (Gain-Loss Threshold Ratio) (Source: Quantitative Risk Consortium, 2026-10-20), governing exact floating-point precision, day-count con

Elena Rostova, FRM, CQFRead dossier →
Quantitative Pricing & Options Engines

Omega Ratio & Calmar Maximum Drawdown Recovery Engine: Worked $100M Institutional Portfolio Verification Example (1.48x Gain-Loss Threshold Ratio Benchmark)

Omega Ratio & Calmar Maximum Drawdown Recovery Engine (OMEGA-CALMAR) stands at 1.48x (Gain-Loss Threshold Ratio) (Source: Quantitative Risk Consortium, 2026-10-20), governing step-by-step cash flow, margin, and basis-poi

Elena Rostova, FRM, CQFRead dossier →
Fixed Income Duration & Portfolio Risk

Omega Ratio & Calmar Maximum Drawdown Recovery Engine: Observation Shift vs. Lookback Convention Comparison (1.48x Gain-Loss Threshold Ratio Benchmark)

Omega Ratio & Calmar Maximum Drawdown Recovery Engine (OMEGA-CALMAR) stands at 1.48x (Gain-Loss Threshold Ratio) (Source: Quantitative Risk Consortium, 2026-10-20), governing accrual period weighting differences and sett

Elena Rostova, FRM, CQFRead dossier →
Cleared Margin & VaR Models

Omega Ratio & Calmar Maximum Drawdown Recovery Engine: Historical Stress Testing & Tail-Risk Scenario Calibration (1.48x Gain-Loss Threshold Ratio Benchmark)

Omega Ratio & Calmar Maximum Drawdown Recovery Engine (OMEGA-CALMAR) stands at 1.48x (Gain-Loss Threshold Ratio) (Source: Quantitative Risk Consortium, 2026-10-20), governing 2008 Lehman, 2020 Dash-for-Cash, and 2026 rat

Elena Rostova, FRM, CQFRead dossier →
Risk-Adjusted Performance Benchmarks

Omega Ratio & Calmar Maximum Drawdown Recovery Engine: Cross-Margining & Capital Efficiency Optimization (1.48x Gain-Loss Threshold Ratio Benchmark)

Omega Ratio & Calmar Maximum Drawdown Recovery Engine (OMEGA-CALMAR) stands at 1.48x (Gain-Loss Threshold Ratio) (Source: Quantitative Risk Consortium, 2026-10-20), governing inter-commodity correlation offsets and liqui

Elena Rostova, FRM, CQFRead dossier →
Quantitative Pricing & Options Engines

Omega Ratio & Calmar Maximum Drawdown Recovery Engine: Sensitivity Analysis in a 3.75%–4.40% SOFR Rate Regime (1.48x Gain-Loss Threshold Ratio Benchmark)

Omega Ratio & Calmar Maximum Drawdown Recovery Engine (OMEGA-CALMAR) stands at 1.48x (Gain-Loss Threshold Ratio) (Source: Quantitative Risk Consortium, 2026-10-20), governing risk-free hurdle rate compression of excess r

Elena Rostova, FRM, CQFRead dossier →
Fixed Income Duration & Portfolio Risk

Omega Ratio & Calmar Maximum Drawdown Recovery Engine: Execution Slippage, Haircut Floors & Rebalancing Drag (1.48x Gain-Loss Threshold Ratio Benchmark)

Omega Ratio & Calmar Maximum Drawdown Recovery Engine (OMEGA-CALMAR) stands at 1.48x (Gain-Loss Threshold Ratio) (Source: Quantitative Risk Consortium, 2026-10-20), governing bid-ask spread amortization and turnover-adju

Elena Rostova, FRM, CQFRead dossier →
Cleared Margin & VaR Models

Omega Ratio & Calmar Maximum Drawdown Recovery Engine: Model Risk Management (SR 11-7) Validation Benchmarks (1.48x Gain-Loss Threshold Ratio Benchmark)

Omega Ratio & Calmar Maximum Drawdown Recovery Engine (OMEGA-CALMAR) stands at 1.48x (Gain-Loss Threshold Ratio) (Source: Quantitative Risk Consortium, 2026-10-20), governing backtesting Kupiec POF exceptions and Christo

Elena Rostova, FRM, CQFRead dossier →
Quantitative Pricing & Options Engines

Key Rate Duration (KRD) & Partial DV01 Yield Curve Bucketing: Closed-Form Mathematical Specification & IEEE-754 Verification ($17,500 DV01 per $100M Benchmark)

Key Rate Duration (KRD) & Partial DV01 Yield Curve Bucketing (KEY-RATE-DV01) stands at $17,500 (DV01 per $100M) (Source: Fixed Income Risk Desk Standard, 2026-10-20), governing exact floating-point precision, day-count c

Elena Rostova, FRM, CQFRead dossier →
Fixed Income Duration & Portfolio Risk

Key Rate Duration (KRD) & Partial DV01 Yield Curve Bucketing: Worked $100M Institutional Portfolio Verification Example ($17,500 DV01 per $100M Benchmark)

Key Rate Duration (KRD) & Partial DV01 Yield Curve Bucketing (KEY-RATE-DV01) stands at $17,500 (DV01 per $100M) (Source: Fixed Income Risk Desk Standard, 2026-10-20), governing step-by-step cash flow, margin, and basis-p

Elena Rostova, FRM, CQFRead dossier →
Cleared Margin & VaR Models

Key Rate Duration (KRD) & Partial DV01 Yield Curve Bucketing: Observation Shift vs. Lookback Convention Comparison ($17,500 DV01 per $100M Benchmark)

Key Rate Duration (KRD) & Partial DV01 Yield Curve Bucketing (KEY-RATE-DV01) stands at $17,500 (DV01 per $100M) (Source: Fixed Income Risk Desk Standard, 2026-10-20), governing accrual period weighting differences and se

Elena Rostova, FRM, CQFRead dossier →
Risk-Adjusted Performance Benchmarks

Key Rate Duration (KRD) & Partial DV01 Yield Curve Bucketing: Historical Stress Testing & Tail-Risk Scenario Calibration ($17,500 DV01 per $100M Benchmark)

Key Rate Duration (KRD) & Partial DV01 Yield Curve Bucketing (KEY-RATE-DV01) stands at $17,500 (DV01 per $100M) (Source: Fixed Income Risk Desk Standard, 2026-10-20), governing 2008 Lehman, 2020 Dash-for-Cash, and 2026 r

Elena Rostova, FRM, CQFRead dossier →
Quantitative Pricing & Options Engines

Key Rate Duration (KRD) & Partial DV01 Yield Curve Bucketing: Cross-Margining & Capital Efficiency Optimization ($17,500 DV01 per $100M Benchmark)

Key Rate Duration (KRD) & Partial DV01 Yield Curve Bucketing (KEY-RATE-DV01) stands at $17,500 (DV01 per $100M) (Source: Fixed Income Risk Desk Standard, 2026-10-20), governing inter-commodity correlation offsets and liq

Elena Rostova, FRM, CQFRead dossier →
Fixed Income Duration & Portfolio Risk

Key Rate Duration (KRD) & Partial DV01 Yield Curve Bucketing: Sensitivity Analysis in a 3.75%–4.40% SOFR Rate Regime ($17,500 DV01 per $100M Benchmark)

Key Rate Duration (KRD) & Partial DV01 Yield Curve Bucketing (KEY-RATE-DV01) stands at $17,500 (DV01 per $100M) (Source: Fixed Income Risk Desk Standard, 2026-10-20), governing risk-free hurdle rate compression of excess

Elena Rostova, FRM, CQFRead dossier →
Cleared Margin & VaR Models

Key Rate Duration (KRD) & Partial DV01 Yield Curve Bucketing: Execution Slippage, Haircut Floors & Rebalancing Drag ($17,500 DV01 per $100M Benchmark)

Key Rate Duration (KRD) & Partial DV01 Yield Curve Bucketing (KEY-RATE-DV01) stands at $17,500 (DV01 per $100M) (Source: Fixed Income Risk Desk Standard, 2026-10-20), governing bid-ask spread amortization and turnover-ad

Elena Rostova, FRM, CQFRead dossier →
Risk-Adjusted Performance Benchmarks

Key Rate Duration (KRD) & Partial DV01 Yield Curve Bucketing: Model Risk Management (SR 11-7) Validation Benchmarks ($17,500 DV01 per $100M Benchmark)

Key Rate Duration (KRD) & Partial DV01 Yield Curve Bucketing (KEY-RATE-DV01) stands at $17,500 (DV01 per $100M) (Source: Fixed Income Risk Desk Standard, 2026-10-20), governing backtesting Kupiec POF exceptions and Chris

Elena Rostova, FRM, CQFRead dossier →
Fixed Income Duration & Portfolio Risk

Cholesky Multi-Asset Correlated Monte Carlo Path Simulator: Closed-Form Mathematical Specification & IEEE-754 Verification (10,000 Simulated Paths Benchmark)

Cholesky Multi-Asset Correlated Monte Carlo Path Simulator (MONTE-CARLO-CHOLESKY) stands at 10,000 (Simulated Paths) (Source: OCC / CME Risk Architecture, 2026-10-20), governing exact floating-point precision, day-count

Elena Rostova, FRM, CQFRead dossier →
Cleared Margin & VaR Models

Cholesky Multi-Asset Correlated Monte Carlo Path Simulator: Worked $100M Institutional Portfolio Verification Example (10,000 Simulated Paths Benchmark)

Cholesky Multi-Asset Correlated Monte Carlo Path Simulator (MONTE-CARLO-CHOLESKY) stands at 10,000 (Simulated Paths) (Source: OCC / CME Risk Architecture, 2026-10-20), governing step-by-step cash flow, margin, and basis-

Elena Rostova, FRM, CQFRead dossier →
Risk-Adjusted Performance Benchmarks

Cholesky Multi-Asset Correlated Monte Carlo Path Simulator: Observation Shift vs. Lookback Convention Comparison (10,000 Simulated Paths Benchmark)

Cholesky Multi-Asset Correlated Monte Carlo Path Simulator (MONTE-CARLO-CHOLESKY) stands at 10,000 (Simulated Paths) (Source: OCC / CME Risk Architecture, 2026-10-20), governing accrual period weighting differences and s

Elena Rostova, FRM, CQFRead dossier →
Quantitative Pricing & Options Engines

Cholesky Multi-Asset Correlated Monte Carlo Path Simulator: Historical Stress Testing & Tail-Risk Scenario Calibration (10,000 Simulated Paths Benchmark)

Cholesky Multi-Asset Correlated Monte Carlo Path Simulator (MONTE-CARLO-CHOLESKY) stands at 10,000 (Simulated Paths) (Source: OCC / CME Risk Architecture, 2026-10-20), governing 2008 Lehman, 2020 Dash-for-Cash, and 2026

Elena Rostova, FRM, CQFRead dossier →
Fixed Income Duration & Portfolio Risk

Cholesky Multi-Asset Correlated Monte Carlo Path Simulator: Cross-Margining & Capital Efficiency Optimization (10,000 Simulated Paths Benchmark)

Cholesky Multi-Asset Correlated Monte Carlo Path Simulator (MONTE-CARLO-CHOLESKY) stands at 10,000 (Simulated Paths) (Source: OCC / CME Risk Architecture, 2026-10-20), governing inter-commodity correlation offsets and li

Elena Rostova, FRM, CQFRead dossier →
Cleared Margin & VaR Models

Cholesky Multi-Asset Correlated Monte Carlo Path Simulator: Sensitivity Analysis in a 3.75%–4.40% SOFR Rate Regime (10,000 Simulated Paths Benchmark)

Cholesky Multi-Asset Correlated Monte Carlo Path Simulator (MONTE-CARLO-CHOLESKY) stands at 10,000 (Simulated Paths) (Source: OCC / CME Risk Architecture, 2026-10-20), governing risk-free hurdle rate compression of exces

Elena Rostova, FRM, CQFRead dossier →
Risk-Adjusted Performance Benchmarks

Cholesky Multi-Asset Correlated Monte Carlo Path Simulator: Execution Slippage, Haircut Floors & Rebalancing Drag (10,000 Simulated Paths Benchmark)

Cholesky Multi-Asset Correlated Monte Carlo Path Simulator (MONTE-CARLO-CHOLESKY) stands at 10,000 (Simulated Paths) (Source: OCC / CME Risk Architecture, 2026-10-20), governing bid-ask spread amortization and turnover-a

Elena Rostova, FRM, CQFRead dossier →
Quantitative Pricing & Options Engines

Cholesky Multi-Asset Correlated Monte Carlo Path Simulator: Model Risk Management (SR 11-7) Validation Benchmarks (10,000 Simulated Paths Benchmark)

Cholesky Multi-Asset Correlated Monte Carlo Path Simulator (MONTE-CARLO-CHOLESKY) stands at 10,000 (Simulated Paths) (Source: OCC / CME Risk Architecture, 2026-10-20), governing backtesting Kupiec POF exceptions and Chri

Elena Rostova, FRM, CQFRead dossier →
Cleared Margin & VaR Models

Leveraged Treasury Repo Carry & Breakeven Rolldown Calculator: Closed-Form Mathematical Specification & IEEE-754 Verification (-5.59 bps Breakeven Yield Shift Benchmark)

Leveraged Treasury Repo Carry & Breakeven Rolldown Calculator (REPO-CARRY-ROLLED) stands at -5.59 bps (Breakeven Yield Shift) (Source: NY Fed / Treasury Repo Desk, 2026-10-20), governing exact floating-point precision, d

Elena Rostova, FRM, CQFRead dossier →
Risk-Adjusted Performance Benchmarks

Leveraged Treasury Repo Carry & Breakeven Rolldown Calculator: Worked $100M Institutional Portfolio Verification Example (-5.59 bps Breakeven Yield Shift Benchmark)

Leveraged Treasury Repo Carry & Breakeven Rolldown Calculator (REPO-CARRY-ROLLED) stands at -5.59 bps (Breakeven Yield Shift) (Source: NY Fed / Treasury Repo Desk, 2026-10-20), governing step-by-step cash flow, margin, a

Elena Rostova, FRM, CQFRead dossier →
Quantitative Pricing & Options Engines

Leveraged Treasury Repo Carry & Breakeven Rolldown Calculator: Observation Shift vs. Lookback Convention Comparison (-5.59 bps Breakeven Yield Shift Benchmark)

Leveraged Treasury Repo Carry & Breakeven Rolldown Calculator (REPO-CARRY-ROLLED) stands at -5.59 bps (Breakeven Yield Shift) (Source: NY Fed / Treasury Repo Desk, 2026-10-20), governing accrual period weighting differen

Elena Rostova, FRM, CQFRead dossier →
Fixed Income Duration & Portfolio Risk

Leveraged Treasury Repo Carry & Breakeven Rolldown Calculator: Historical Stress Testing & Tail-Risk Scenario Calibration (-5.59 bps Breakeven Yield Shift Benchmark)

Leveraged Treasury Repo Carry & Breakeven Rolldown Calculator (REPO-CARRY-ROLLED) stands at -5.59 bps (Breakeven Yield Shift) (Source: NY Fed / Treasury Repo Desk, 2026-10-20), governing 2008 Lehman, 2020 Dash-for-Cash,

Elena Rostova, FRM, CQFRead dossier →
Institutional Research Briefings & Analytical Dossiers | QuantCalc Tools | QuantCalc Tools